It’s no secret that photographers often photoshop their photos to make them look good. I am always asked if I retouch, enhance, or photoshop my pictures, and pretty much my answer is always yes. I think it is important that you make a picture look as good as possible! Although, too often I will see other photographers’ work and it’s blatanly obvious that they overdid it in photoshop. My rule of thumb is that if you are distracted by the work done in photoshop then the photographer/editor has either overdone it or not done it correctly. Most of the time I use Photoshop (or Lightroom) to make the pictures look the way I had originally intended, or to give them a little extra pop. I want my pictures to look natural so you shouldn’t be able to tell which parts of the image I enhanced or retouched.
Often I am asked what the difference is between proofs and reprints, and what the difference is between our “enhanced proofing” and straight out of the camera proofing. So I thought I would provide some visual aids. For the first set of photos you can see the difference between what was shot (straight out of the camera), the editing I did for the enhanced proofing, and then the extra editing I did for the final print. The second set of photos shows the difference between straight out of the camera and the final print.
Straight out of camera:
The enhanced proof:
The final print (darkened the background so your eye focuses on Daniel and Ruth):
Straight out of camera:
Final Print (Made B&W, lightened Mom’s face, selective focus on dress and Mom/blurred bridesmaids in the background, darkened distracting objects, and cropped):
3 comments